| 张大群.学术论文的评价资源探究:修辞学视角[J].井冈山大学社科版,2016,(5):92-97,111 |
| 学术论文的评价资源探究:修辞学视角 |
| An Exploration of the Appraisal Resources of Academic Papers: Perspective of Rhetoric |
| 投稿时间：2016-08-10 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-8107.2016.05.016 |
| 中文关键词: 学术论文 评价 修辞 |
| 英文关键词: academic paper appraisal rhetoric |
| 基金项目:国家社科基金项目“英语学术语篇的评价资源研究”（项目编号：11CYY061）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1841 |
| 全文下载次数: 2402 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 评价的修辞说服功能在崇尚客观严谨的学术论文语类中表现得极为隐蔽精巧。从修辞学的修辞三艺和修辞三诉求两个方面来探究学术论文的评价资源，可以有效阐释学术论文高度复杂的评价资源与语类修辞目标之间的潜在关联。反映写作者态度意义的评价体现在学术论文觅材取材、谋篇布局和文体风格的全过程。同时，理性诉求、情感诉求和人格诉求构成了学术论文评价意义的三种理据。学术论文的理性诉求居于绝对中心地位，情感诉求和人格诉求可以被视作个人化的理性诉求。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The rhetorical persuasive function of appraisal is delicately expressed in the genre of academic papers featured in objectivity and precision. Exploration of the appraisal resources in perspectives of the three arts and three appellations in rhetoric help effectively explain the potential relationships between the highly sophisticated resources and the rhetoric goals of genre. The appraisal of the writer's attitude lies in the whole process of material collection and selection, textual arrangement and styles. At mean time, the rational, emotive and moral appellations form three motivations of the appraisal meaning of an academic paper. The rational appellation is core of the paper, while the other two can be regarded as personalized rational appellation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
