| 熊云辉,李自涛.论在线诉讼法官阐明义务[J].井冈山大学社科版,2024,45(1):87-96 |
| 论在线诉讼法官阐明义务 |
| On Obligation of Judge Clarification in Online Litigation |
| 投稿时间：2023-10-12 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-8107.2024.01.011 |
| 中文关键词: 在线诉讼 法官阐明义务 诉讼效率 权利保障 |
| 英文关键词: online litigation judge's obligation to clarify litigation Efficiency right protection |
| 基金项目:江西省高校人文社科项目“在线诉讼当事人自我责任研究”（项目编号：FX21105）；中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“在线诉讼当事人自我责任研究”（项目编号：2021M701506） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 283 |
| 全文下载次数: 382 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在线诉讼是诉讼信息化改革取得的重要成果，法官阐明在在线诉讼中发挥着重要作用，有利于提高司法效率，维护司法公正，保障当事人的权利。区别于传统诉讼中法官阐明的双重属性，在线诉讼法官阐明性质界定为义务似乎更加妥当，在当事人主义民事诉讼模式下，在线诉讼程序遵循的当事人同意原则依赖于法官阐明义务的履行。在线诉讼中法官阐明义务的内容、行使方式、时机都有了新的变化。法官违反阐明义务，应当阐明而未阐明，应赋予当事人上诉的救济权。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Online litigation is becoming an major achievement of judicial information reform, in which the liability of clarification for judge plays an important role. It can not only improve judicial efficiency, but also safeguard judicial justice and protect the rights of the relevant parties. Different from the dual attributes of judge clarification of in traditional litigation, it seems more appropriate to define the nature of judge clarification of online litigation as obligation. Under the civil litigation mode of following the adversary system, the principle of consent of the parties followed by the online litigation procedure depends on the performance of the judge's obligation to clarify. There are new changes in the content, exercise mode and timing of the judge's clarification obligation in online litigation. If the judge violates the obligation of clarification, which he should clarify but not clarify, and the parties should be given the right of appeal relief. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
