| 卢永和.文学记忆：“自我”的面相及其表征意义[J].井冈山大学社科版,2023,44(1):107-113 |
| 文学记忆：“自我”的面相及其表征意义 |
| Literary Memory: the Face of “Self” and its Representational Meaning |
| 投稿时间：2022-09-10 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-8107.2023.01.013 |
| 中文关键词: 文学记忆 自我 主我 客我 |
| 英文关键词: Literary memory Self I Me |
| 基金项目:广东省哲学社会科学规划学科共建项目“记忆诗学的理论谱系与艺术表征研究”(项目编号:GD18XZW14)。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 247 |
| 全文下载次数: 288 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 美国社会心理学家米德将“自我”分为“主我”与“客我”两个面相,此观点有助于理解文学记忆叙述中的“自我”意涵。从“客我”层面而言,“见证文学”中回忆的“自我”,是社会表征的一个符号;而《忏悔录》中回忆的“自我”,既是一个“主我”(独特的文学典型),亦是一个“客我”(浸染时代精神的社会人)。詹姆斯与伯格森的“自我”意识理论,可以用来解释两种不同风格的意识流文学。文学中的“自我”回忆,既是指向叙述主体之自身的回忆,亦是指涉自身所属群体的回忆。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The American social psychologist George Herbert Mead divides the " self" into the " I" and the " Me". This view helps us understand the meaning of " self" in the narrative of literary memory.From the perspective of the " Me", the "self" recalled in " literature as testimony" is a symbol of social collective representation. The " self" recalled in Confessions is not only the " I", that is, a unique literary model, but also the " Me", that is, a social person infused with the spirit of the times. James and Bergson's theory of self-consciousness can be used to explain two different styles of stream-of-consciousness literature. The " self" recollection in literature refers to both the individual recollection of the narrative subject itself and the collective recollection of the group to which one belongs. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
