| 陈帅.资本批判与权力规训——马克思和福柯现代性批判理论的关系探析[J].井冈山大学社科版,2021,(4):47-53 |
| 资本批判与权力规训——马克思和福柯现代性批判理论的关系探析 |
| Critique of Capital and Discipline of Power——A Comparative Study of Marx and Foucault's Critical Theories of Modernity |
| 投稿时间：2021-03-20 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-8107.2021.04.007 |
| 中文关键词: 现代性批判 资本逻辑 权力规训 总体性 非历史主义 |
| 英文关键词: Criticism of modernity Logic of capital Discipline of power Totality Non-historicism |
| 基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目“新时代条件下有效社会认同的建构路径研究”（项目编号：2662018QD045）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1358 |
| 全文下载次数: 2179 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 马克思和福柯是生活在不同时代的理论家，面临的历史环境决定了二者要解决的理论问题和研究视域上的差异。尽管两者的理论逻辑、研究方法存在很大的差别，但对现代人的生存状况的反思、对现代性危机根源的揭示、对实现人的自由解放路径的探索仍然是他们共同的研究主题。他们都对现实人做了历史的、具体的考察与分析，都为解决人类生存困境积极寻求出路。虽然存在差异，但不可否认在对现代性的批判上两者存在着某种联系。这种隐藏在令人瞩目的差异背后的联系让他们的现代性批判理论呈现出一种复杂性，以至于许多人在承认二者确有某种关联的同时却难以说明关联本身。从总体上分析，“资本”和“权力”在奠定了马克思和福柯对现代性症结的诊断的同时，也影响着他们对现代性问题的分析。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Marx and Foucault lived in different ages. In the different historical environments, they faced the different issues of theory and different research fields. Although their theoretical logic and research methods are very different with each other, Marx and Foucault have the common research themes, such as reflection of the living conditions of modern people, revelation of the root of crisis of modernity, and exploration of the way to realize the freedom of man, etc. Both of them made historical and specific investigation of the real life and actively sought the way to solve the predicament of human existence. Though there is difference between their theories, there is a connection between them in critique of modernity. This connection which hides behind the striking differences make their critical theory of modernity complex. As a result, many scholars admit that there is a certain correlation between their theory, however, they can't point it out. Generally speaking, "capital" and "power"have laid the foundation for analysis of the crux of modernity. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
