文章摘要
徐可.马克思经济学的“非均衡”构建——《资本论》的“总体性”及其现实意义[J].井冈山大学社科版,2021,(3):63-72
马克思经济学的“非均衡”构建——《资本论》的“总体性”及其现实意义
The “Non-equilibrium” Construction of Marxist Economics——The Totality of “Das Kapital” and Its Practical Significance
投稿时间:2020-12-27  
DOI:10.3969/J1674-8107.2021.03.009
中文关键词: 《资本论》  非均衡  总体性  卢卡奇  辩证法
英文关键词: Capital  Non-equilibrium  Totality  Lukács  Dialectics
基金项目:
作者单位
徐可 郑州财经学院经济研究所, 河南 郑州 4500040 
摘要点击次数: 1018
全文下载次数: 1379
中文摘要:
      卢卡奇和科尔施从哲学上恢复了马克思“总体性”的理论意义。《资本论》以资本扩张为主线,揭示了社会经济系统中非均衡的内在根源、动力机制与历史路径,涵盖了西方经济学中诸多零散的非均衡思想并构成了内在统一的理论体系,这是从经济学角度解读“总体性”的逻辑线索。资本辩证法将资本扩张过程中诸多要素“对立统一”为整体,从而成为“总体性”的构造工具。中国特色社会主义建设实践不断为“总体性”增添具体内容并呈现出“总体——具体”的创新路径,而西方经济学因“总体性”缺失陷入“均衡——非均衡”的往复争辩从而形成“具体——总体”的发展路径。“总体性”赋予马克思经济学方法论优势以整合与融通各种学说流派的理论与思想,这对于构建中国特色社会主义经济理论体系具有重大的指导意义。
英文摘要:
      Lukács and Korsch restored philosophically the theoretical significance of Marx's "totality". In Das Kapital, Marx takes capital expansion as the main line, reveals the internal cause, dynamic mechanism and historical path of non-equilibrium in social-economic system, integrates various non-equilibrium thoughts scattered in Western economics into a theoretical system that is unified intrinsically. This offers a logical clue towards "totality". Capital dialectics turns diverse elements into “unity of opposites” in the process of capital expansion, which becomes a methodological tool of "totality". The practice of socialism construction with Chinese characteristics continues to add specific content to “totality” and forms a “general-specific” path, which is different from the western“specific-general” path that results from the debate of “equilibrium and non-equilibrium” in the western economics due to the lack of “totality”. "Totality" endows Marx's economic methodology ability to reconcile the different theories and ideas of different schools with each other. This has a great guiding significance for the practice of the socialism economic theory with Chinese characteristics.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭