| 王志华.历史现象学：马克思和胡塞尔[J].井冈山大学社科版,2019,(1):84-91 |
| 历史现象学：马克思和胡塞尔 |
| Phenomenology of History: Marx and Husserl |
| 投稿时间：2018-10-14 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-8107.2019.01.013 |
| 中文关键词: 历史现象学 内历史 纵向本质直观 透过现象看本质 |
| 英文关键词: historical phenomenology inner history intuition of inner history perception of inner history through phenomena |
| 基金项目:江西省高校人文社科规划项目“史学碎片化的困境及出路——唯物史观的视角”（项目编号：ZX161001）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 10211 |
| 全文下载次数: 18941 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 马克思和胡塞尔均对内历史或历史的内在本质和历史认识论做出了经典的分析。关于前者，胡塞尔认为它根源于主体的意向性，马克思则坚持它根源于物质生活资料及生产方式这一客体。关于后者，胡塞尔阐述了"纵向本质直观"这一方法及其理论依据，马克思则论证了"透过现象看本质"方法的合理性。总起来看，马克思对这两个问题的解答在逻辑上更为自洽，也更加契合史学实践。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Both Marx and Husserl classically expound the subjects of Inner History and Historical Epistemology.For the former subject,Husserl insists that it originates in subject's intentionality while Marx asserts it in Means of Material Subsistence and Mode of Production.For the latter subject,Husserl explains the method of Intuition of Inner History and its theoretical basis while Marx analyses the method of Perceiving Inner History through Phenomenology and its rationality.In general,Marx's theory is logically more self-evident and more consistent with the practice of historiography than Husserl's. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
