| 李平.范文澜注“张衡怨篇”句辨析[J].井冈山大学社科版,2018,(3):100-104 |
| 范文澜注“张衡怨篇”句辨析 |
| Analysis of Fan Wenlan's Annotations to “Zhang Heng Yuan Pian” |
| 投稿时间：2018-02-27 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-8107.2018.03.013 |
| 中文关键词: 范文澜 《文心雕龙注》 《明诗》 《文心雕龙辑注》 辨析 |
| 英文关键词: Fan Wenlan Wen Xin Diao Long Ming Shi Wen Xin Diao Long Ji Zhu Analysis |
| 基金项目:国家社科基金项目"海峡两岸‘龙学’比较研究"（项目编号：15BZW040）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1615 |
| 全文下载次数: 2080 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 范文澜注《文心雕龙·明诗》"张衡怨篇，清典可味；仙诗缓歌，雅有新声"，不仅存在字讹序倒、人名错标、卷次淆乱诸多讹失，而且将黄注、纪评、李补和黄札裒辑于一体，统统置于李详名下，既有乖其书著述体例，又致使阅者错识颜标，还导致注文仰逼俯侵。故须辨析其讹误与错失，使黄注、纪评、李补与黄札各归其所。而在辨析过程中，还可以依据此条注文所透露的信息，判断"范注"所据底本为扫叶山房石印本《文心雕龙辑注》。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Fan Wenlan's annotations related to "Zhang Heng Yuan Pian, Qing Dian Ke Wei; Xian Shi Huan Ge, Ya You Xin Sheng" (Zhang Heng's poem of complaint is classic and gracious; his other two poems Xian Shi and Huan Ge are sublime" in Wen Xin Diao Long·Ming Shi ("On Poetry" in A System of Literary Criteria) are not correct in characters, names, editions, etc. For, example, Mr. Fan misunderstands Huang's annotations, Ji's comments, Li's supplements and Huang's notes as what Li Xiang made so that readers would be misled. Therefore, it's necessary to point out such kind of mistakes. Through analysis of the annotations, it's found out that Fan's annotations are based on Wen Xin Diao Long Ji Zhu (A System of Literary Criteria with Annotations) copied by Shaoyeshanfang publisher. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
