| 耿密.抗战时期中国的“四强”地位再解读——从比较视野所作的分析[J].井冈山大学社科版,2018,(1):123-129 |
| 抗战时期中国的“四强”地位再解读——从比较视野所作的分析 |
| Re-interpreting China's Status as “One of the Four Strong Countries” in the WWⅡ: An analysis in comparative horizon |
| 投稿时间：2017-10-25 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-8107.2018.01.018 |
| 中文关键词: 抗战时期 战时四强 中国国际地位 |
| 英文关键词: WWⅡ time Strong Four at War China's international status |
| 基金项目:重庆市社科规划博士项目"美国视阈下的抗战中国形象"（项目编号：2016BS064）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 10245 |
| 全文下载次数: 19202 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 抗战时期中国的"四强"地位一直以来都受到学界关注，但也存在一定争议。争议的原因源于当时一种矛盾的史实：一方面，中国在战时参与了世界反法西斯阵营的一些重要会议，体现出了战时"四强"的身份；而另一方面，中国在"四强"中的地位又是尴尬的，受到苏联或英国排挤，甚至两国领导人曾不予承认中国的四强地位。解读这一看似矛盾的历史现象，可以考虑从比较的视野中进行观察。从纵向上看，此时的中国已经跻身战时"四强"群体中；从横向上看，此时的中国是除美英苏三大国之外当然的战时"第四大国"。因而，战时中国的"四强"地位是实至名归的。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| China's Status as One of "the Four Strong Countries" in the Second World War, though highly noted by the academic community, is under disputes due to the following contradictory historical facts:on the one hand, China participated certain important meetings of the world anti-fascist front, which suggested membership of the"Strong four" in the war; on the other hand, China was squeezed by the USSR and the U.K., and even denied by them to be "one of the Strong Four". The seemingly contradictory historical phenomena can be interpreted in a comparative horizon. Compared with what it seemed earlier, China had moved forward into the "Strong Four"; compared with countries at that time, it had been certainly the "fourth strongest country", following the U.S, the U.S.S. R and the U.K. Hence, China's status as one of the "Strong Four" in WWⅡ is substantial and solid. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
