| 王裕根.自由的逻辑构造: 马克思博士论文研究[J].井冈山大学社科版,2015,(3):75-82 |
| 自由的逻辑构造: 马克思博士论文研究 |
| Logic Construction of Freedom:A Study of Marx's Doctoral Dissertation |
| 投稿时间：2015-01-10 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-8107.2015.03.013 |
| 中文关键词: 自由 博士论文 异化 |
| 英文关键词: freedom Doctoral Dissertation alienation |
| 基金项目:教育部人文社科规划项目“马克思早期法哲学思想研究”(项目编号院12YJA710102)。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1915 |
| 全文下载次数: 2583 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 马克思在博士论文中,通过分析德谟克利特和伊壁鸠鲁自然哲学的一般差别和具体差别,并在详细考察二者的差别中,从哲学发展史的角度系统阐述了原子论思想。马克思通过论述伊壁鸠鲁哲学“原子偏斜学说”,肯定了人性自由的主体向度,在理论上阐述了自由的逻辑构造。从法哲学角度看,对自由的正当性论证是马克思与霍布斯的共同目标,但二者在论证人性自由的路径上,分别表现为异化逻辑和政治科学理论的差别。博士论文中显现的异化逻辑为后来马克思对资本主义社会法权关系进行深入批判提供了思维工具,并在此基础上构建了一种实质的自由观。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In his Doctoral Dissertation, Karl Marx analyzed the general and specific differences between Democritus' and Epicurus' natural philosophies, and, on basis on which, he elaborated the thought of atomism in perspective of philosophic development history. Through his revealing of "atom inclination doctrine" in Epicurean philosophy, he confirmed the subjective dimension of human freedom and elaborated theoretically the logical construction of freedom. In perspective of legal (right) philosophy, Marx shared with Hobbs a goal of justifying freedom However, in approaches to justifying, they showed differences in alienation logic and political scientific theory. The alienation logic illustrated in the Doctoral Dissertation provided thinking tools for Marx's deep critique of the law-right relationship in capitalist society, and helped him therefrom constructed a view of essential freedom. There were fundamental difference and connections between formal freedom and essential freedom. Essential freedom is freedom pursued by Marx for resume of human nature, while formal freedom is freedom in liberal legal philosophy. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
