文章摘要
唐代兴.抑制气候失律与恢复气候生境的道德原则[J].井冈山大学社科版,2015,(2):34-43
抑制气候失律与恢复气候生境的道德原则
Moral Principles for Controlling Climate Irregularity and Restoring Climate Environments
投稿时间:2014-12-16  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8107.2015.02.006
中文关键词: 气候公正  利害权衡  权责对等  问责原则  污染者付费
英文关键词: climate justice  benefit-cost balance  right-responsibility equivalence  principle of accountability  polluter-pays
基金项目:国家社科基金项目“生态文明建设中的气候伦理研究”(项目编号:14BZX100)
作者单位
唐代兴 四川师范大政治教育学院, 四川 成都 610066 
摘要点击次数: 1866
全文下载次数: 2715
中文摘要:
      目前,无论国际社会还是国家社会,气候博弈成为实践难题。因为有关气候治理的政治协商和减排方案,既缺少必需的伦理支撑,更缺乏共守的道德原则的指导。公正原则之可以构成全球气候治理的基本道德原则,是因为它能为气候治理发挥认知和操作两个方面的引导规范功能。在认知层面,利害权衡和分配平等构成气候公正的根本认知原则;行为动机应当、手段正当和结果正义有机统一,构成气候公正的评价导向原则。以权责对等和分配平等为基本规范,形成气候公正实施的问责原则和污染者付费原则:前者展开为历史问责、现实问责和未来问责的具体规范原则;后者落实为“谁污染谁担责”和“谁受害谁得益”的利益分配公正。
英文摘要:
      Climate game has been a dilemma for both national and international community. One reason for the situation is the fact that the hitherto political negotiations and emission-reduction plans lack both necessary ethical foundation and common moral principles. The principle of justice may serve as the fundamental moral principle for global climate governance, due to its functions in cognition and practice of the governance. The basic cognition principle of benefit-cost balance and and distribution equality, and the organic unity of proper motivation, proper means and justifiable results forms principle of climate justice assessment. The basic norms of right-responsibility equivalence and distribution equality lead to the principle of climate actions: accountability and polluter-pays: the former consists of historical responsibility, current responsibility and future responsibility, and the latter covers the justices of “he who pollutes pays” and “he who suffers takes”.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭