| 钟长洲.“分兵”与“集中”:中央与前委关于红四军早期斗争方式的思考——以对中央“二月来信”的解析为中心的考察[J].井冈山大学社科版,2015,(2):12-16 |
| “分兵”与“集中”:中央与前委关于红四军早期斗争方式的思考——以对中央“二月来信”的解析为中心的考察 |
| Scattering or Centralizing of Forces: Different Thoughts on Early Military Struggles between the CPC Central Committee and the Red Army Frontier Commission ——A Scrutiny based on the Central Committee's "February Letter" |
| 投稿时间：2014-10-15 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-8107.2015.02.002 |
| 中文关键词: 中央“二月来信” 红四军 毛泽东 解析 |
| 英文关键词: February Letter Fourth Red Army Mao Zedong Scrutiny |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2024 |
| 全文下载次数: 3519 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 中央“二月来信”是红四军下井冈山之后,中央对红四军今后斗争发展方向的一封指示信,信中通过对红四军面临的革命形势和党的主观力量的估量,对红四军作出“分兵”的指示。但是,以毛泽东为代表的红四军前委与中央在革命形势的判断和红四军斗争方式的选择上都存在着严重的分歧,因而来信的精神并没有得到红四军前委的积极响应和贯彻实行。仔细对来信进行解析就会发现,虽然中央来信绝非毫无根据,但红四军前委的这种回应也同样有其正当的理由。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The CPC Central Committee's “February Letter” was the Committee's military direction to the Fourth Red Army after the Army's retreat from Jinggangshan in 1929. Based on its estimation of the Revolutionary situations and the Party's effective forces, the Central Committee instructed the Army to “scatter its forces”. However, as the CPC Frontier Commission in the Army, represented by Mao Zedong, had very different judgment of the situations and choices of military struggle forms, the instructions of the Letter was not enthusiastically responded or enforced. A scrutiny of the Letter found that though the Later is based on rationality and the Frontier Commission's response is also on reasonable basis. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
