| 李兴建,贾文慧.思想与行为不应是思想政治教育学的起点范畴——与徐志远商榷[J].井冈山大学社科版,2013,(4):38-41 |
| 思想与行为不应是思想政治教育学的起点范畴——与徐志远商榷 |
| Thoughts and Behavior Ought Not be the Start of Ideological and Political Teaching--Some Disagreement with Xu Zhiyuan |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 思想政治教育学 起点范畴 思想 行为 |
| 英文关键词: ideological and political teaching starting category thoughts behaviors |
| 基金项目:江西社科规划项目“思想政治理论课教学的双主体与双途径研究”（项目编号：09ks203）. |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1874 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 徐志远写的论文《思想与行为：思想政治教育学的逻辑起．最》认为：思想政治教育学的起点范畴只能是思想与行为，而不可能是其他范畴。此论值得商榷。思想政治教育学的起点范畴，有它自身的质和量的规定性，但是，思想与行为这一对范畴，并不符合思想政治教育学起点范畴规定性，思想与行为不应是思想政治教育学的起点范畴。相比较而言，利益，而不是思想与行为，更适合于作为思想政治教育学的起点范畴。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In his paper ＂ Thoughts and Behaviors as Logical Start of Ideological and Political Teaching,＂ Xu Zhiyuan believes that start of the teaching should be no other but thoughts and behaviors. I have some disagreement. The category of ＂strat of ideological and political teaching＂ should be defined by its quality and quantity,which, however, cannot be used to define thoughts and behaviors. Hence neither thoughts nor behaviors can be the start. Interests, when compared with thoughts and behavior, would be more suitable for the category. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
