| 朱涛.从“背离”到“规范”——扬·穆卡若夫斯基对俄罗斯形式论学派之超越[J].井冈山大学社科版,2013,(3):101-107 |
| 从“背离”到“规范”——扬·穆卡若夫斯基对俄罗斯形式论学派之超越 |
| From ＂Deviation＂ to ＂Norm＂ - Jan Mukarovsky＇s Step over Russ;an Formalism |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 规范——背离 审美规范 布拉格学派 扬·穆卡若夫斯基 |
| 英文关键词: norm deviation aesthetic norm Prague School Jan Mukarovsky |
| 基金项目:国家社科基金项目“扬·穆卡若夫斯基文学与美学理论研究”(项目编号:11CWW001) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2057 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 将"规范——背离"作为一种理论建构模式引入文论研究始于俄罗斯形式论学派,在这一模式指导下,俄罗斯形式论派对"文学性"进行了一系列卓有成效的探索,然而,由于极端重视"背离",而在很大程度上轻视、甚至忽视了"规范",这一不足极大限制了俄罗斯形式论学派在文学性探索上所达到的高度;俄罗斯形式论学派解体后,布拉格学派的扬·穆卡若夫斯基一方面继承了俄罗斯形式论学派的优秀成果,另一方面对其不足进行了批判:早期,他运用"前推"来对"背离"的方式进行描述;后期,他对文学、艺术中的规范类型进行系统研究,将"审美规范"问题提到本体论高度,并论证了这一概念在美学中的必要性和合法性,从而更加辩证、深刻地揭示了审美价值的生成机制。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| ＂ Norm-deviation＂ as a theoretical framework was introduced into literary theory by Formalism. Under the framework, Formalists conducted a series of fruitful explorations of ＂literariness＂ Nevertheless, due to their extreme emphasis on ＂deviation＂ and thus their overlook and even ignorance of ＂norm＂ , the school failed to reach a height which they should have deserved. After the breakdown of the Formalist school, Jan Mukarovsky of the Prague school inherited and criticized the Formalist achievements. In his early theoretical stage, he describes the ＂deviation＂ in ways of ＂foregrounding＂ ; in his later stage he＇ studies the types of norm in literature and arts, and thus puts ＂aesthetic norms＂ at an ontological position and expounds the necessity and illegitimacy of the concept in aesthetics. In this more dialectical and more penetrative way he reveals how aesthetic values are generated. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
