| 习剑平.论行政处罚程序中相对人的抵抗权[J].井冈山大学社科版,2015,(6):119-125 |
| 论行政处罚程序中相对人的抵抗权 |
| On the Right to Resistance of the Administrative Counterpart in Administrative Penalty Procedure |
| 投稿时间：2015-07-10 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-8107.2015.06.021 |
| 中文关键词: 行政处罚程序 行政相对人 抵抗权 无效 公定力 |
| 英文关键词: administrative penalty procedure administrative counterpart right to resistance invalid facto force |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1860 |
| 全文下载次数: 2320 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 抵抗权经历了从政治学到宪法学再到行政法学这样一个发展脉络。从应有权利而言, 在行政处罚程序中确立相对人享有抵抗权, 对于平衡行政主体与相对人的法律地位、防止行政权滥用及维护相对人合法权益等有着积极作用。从法定权利来看, 目前我国相关法律对行政处罚程序中相对人的抵抗权予以了保守、有限的承认。从实有权利而言, 由于无效理论的不完善及其与公定力理论间的紧张关系, 以及相对人抵抗行为与妨害公务罪之间的矛盾等原因, 使抵抗权较难有效实现。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The right to resistance has experienced a development procedure from politics to constitutional law and then to administrative law. In terms of due rights, it has a positive effect of conferring the administrative counterpart the right to resistance in the administrative punishment procedures, balancing the legal position of the administrative subject and the administrative counterpart, and preventing the administrative subject from abusing executive power. In terms of legal rights, the present related administrative punishment laws in China acknowledge some conservative, limited rights of resistance. In terms of actual rights, as the invalid theory is imperfect and its tension with the facto force theory, and the conflict between resistance behavior of administrative counterpart and offense of public function, all these make the right to resistance harder to have effective implementation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
